
At one time Doctor Oz was a somewhat respectable TV personality. This past week, however, he's been taking considerable flak (justifiably so) for a recent show in which in a quite back-handed way he tends to lend credence to conversion therapy (i.e., gay to straight)!
Here is a comment published in the quite-credible ScienceBlog:
http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2012/12/03/dr-oz-is-an-increasingly-da...
Well...
I didn't see the actual show, nor do I care enough to seek it out, but the LGBT activists do go pretty hard line on this stuff, preferring no one even present the ex-gay side in a debate. So, as per usual, their version of dialogue is just present one side. And Dr. Oz seemingly wanted to show both sides, since it is in the news, with California banning the therapy recently. So, it's not like he's bringing up something illegal, but something actually happening. Even one of the GOP candidate's seemingly-gay husband runs an ex-gay ministry. So, I think it is ridiculous to not present something, when ALL the information about it and every group against it sort of paints it as quackery anyway.
Plus, after the episode aired, Dr. Oz did post on his blog:
This seems reasonable. Unless of course, his stance was markedly different in the show that aired and this is his big mea culpa ass-saving apology.
I do disagree with the gay community's desire to shut down debate as a first response. Here is a similar issue where Louis CK breaks down the missed opportunity for actual discussion after the Tracy Morgan controversy: http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/video/louis-ck-tracy-morgan-gay-comment-...
(Their video format doesn't support embedding compatible with Oasis)
It seems juvenile to not want to discuss something if all of the evidence is totally weighted on your side.
UPDATE: I only watched the first segment of the online episode, but it seems like Dr. Oz knew what he was getting into. Seems like a non-issue. He treats the ex-gay people respectfully, but I don't see him agreeing with them.
TRIVIA: Oasis used to have an ex-gay columnist! I forget the name, but I recall saying he could only write about his struggle to become ex-gay if he promised to write about when he gave in and accepted cock. He agreed! This was way too long ago for me to remember any other details, though.
---
"I am living this life as lovingly as I can be as flawed as I am." - Brandon Lacy Campos
I was wrong!
OK… I am truly obliged to "eat crow"
As for my preface to the ScienceBlog link at the head of this page, I definitely wish that my parenthetical statement (justifiably so) had not been made!
This page was initiated only after my having read the commentary of others concerning this particular show by Dr Oz.
This was a major error on my part!
I have now viewed the entire show including the after-show discussions.
Yes… it does infuriate me! The proponents of Reparative Therapy (in my personal estimation) got off much too lightly. The two practitioners of Reparative Therapy (beginning of show) who were first interviewed left me nauseous and quite livid. The inclusion of a representative from NARTH was both daring and outrageous.
But… considering the format of this particular Dr Oz show, I now concede that he did as well as he could!
For those who would like to view the entire show for themselves, go here:
http://www.doctoroz.com/episode/gay-straight-controversial-therapy?video...
You will have to wade through a number of short clips (~3 to 10 minutes each) and some advertising to see the entire show to its end… but if you're truly interested, it's worth the effort.
My apologies to all… and my thanks to Jeff for having indirectly encouraged me to take a second look!
****
For a lighter look at Reparative Therapy, you might enjoy this article which you could easily be excused for believing that it may have been extracted from The Onion (it wasn't):
Ex-Straight Therapy: It Works, and I Am Proof!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-dameron/ex-straight-therapy-it-wor...