Let me take a look at your link...

You're still logged on... Go to bed (and sweet dreams)!

Draco... just to let you know... if you ever do look into the blackness of the darkness outside your window... it will be face looking back at you. :P

That thing that hit your window? That was me. Don't worry :)

But as for the boyfriend, really the only thing you can really do is be there for him and listen to him and all that good stuff. When people get really depressed or are in a funk, only they can dig themselves out of it. He'll be okay.

Can't say much about #6, I don't have any information about it, never heard about that.
I'm sure people much smarter than me are working on it.

#5's pretty easy, gravity is basically non-existent at the quantum level because, well, it's weak. Really, really, really weak.
But then it dominates the cosmos because of a few of it's properties.
Its range is infinite, everything in the universe exerts gravity on everything else.
Everything emits gravity, for the EM force, most things are electrically neutral, the others don't happen past the subatomic level.
Nothing can be used as a shield from gravity. You can use an insulator to stop electricity, there are no gravity shields.
So despite its weakness, those effects let it dominate cosmology.

#4, see #6.

#3 is misleading, black holes don't straight up evaporate into nothing, the emit radiation, and as we know, energy is equal to mass, that's where the mass goes.
And, I actually wrote a whole journal just a few days ago about how Stephen Hawking was wrong about them violating the Law of Conservation of Information, proved by a man named Leonard Susskin, who showed that what happens inside the black hole is only one way to look at what happens, the black hole and its event horizon are connected, events that happen inside the black hole are projected 2-dimensionally on the surface of the event horizon, there is a record of what happens inside.

#2 is really weird, I've known that the properties of particles depend on whether they're being observed, but I didn't know things won't decay if you look at them.
I have heard though, that electrons, and other particles too, behave as particles, but only when you're looking at them. When you're not looking, they behave more as waves, or like they get spread out.
It's really, really weird that the universe changes when it's being observed.

#1, I don't know a whole lot about it, but I've heard that it's possible the neutrinos used like an interdimensional wormhole sort of thing, and Einstein might still have been right. I've heard that in the midst of space, among the zero-point energy that's in every bit of space, microscopic wormholes continually pop in and out of existence.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xt5ghXdq6Z0&safe_search=on