Good heavens I am quite the witling. Apparently I am unable to do the most simple of computer functions and in the process deleted my entire collection of blogs since the new Oasis of last year this time. I apologize, but I am sure that most shall be rejoicing- for, whom I ask wants to read my rubbish of old. Well that is all gone. Although I do have it all saved on in word.
Anywhoo
****
This time of year is one in which I often reflect upon the past year and see what I have, could have, would have, wanted to have done. In most regards it was quite an interesting year, but let us reflect.
January to March: Still shrouded in a layer of internalized homophobia, I often stood upon my tower of megalomanic egoism reciting fabrications, facies of my mind, to a deaf uninterested crowd of vagabonds (such elitism seems not to have changed too much). Pain was the only result. Contemplated transferring.
April to May: See January to March. I finished my first year of University- with decent results.
June to August: Sick of my idiotic past of the past months I became determined to undergo some form of metamorphosis whereby the skin, like the blogs of old, would be shed in favor of some new brighter skin. I went to Italy for these months, and the change was painful and slow. Eventually, however, I came to terms and the proto-new me was born.
September: Saw a possible return to the first five months of this year, but then
November came and with it a new stage of metamorphosis. I went to a gay boy party. The notion of being gay became a stable of who I am. I resolved myself to coming out to my parents over thanksgiving break. It failed, but hope had not deserted me yet. Also I added a new layer of complexity to my gay persona, and joined a gay mentoring program where I get a Prof. who is gay and he becomes my mentor. I met with him and I think that it shall be a good experience.
December: Gay is now practically my middle name, while I am far from flaming, I have to control what I say around my conservative relatives (why is it that relatives always ally themselves with Republicans?) I did come out to my parents with little drama. God how I hate drama of that nature. But at least it is over with.
**
This next year brings the presidential election- I do not know yet who I am to vote for. Chances are I shall vote Libertarian. While Dean holds many values that I like, the idea of universal heath care just plan scares me. In my opinion Doctors are underpaid and overworked. Yes there are some doctors who make millions but the average salary is not reflective of the amount of time and responsibility and stress that they undergo each day. Universal health care will ruin heath care. Likewise, Bush is an obvious no no. I really don't need to go into it, but as gay marriage is now a big deal issue for me, anyone who supports the FMA gets no vote of mine!
Also next year I plan to join this new student group at school where we act as mentors to queer youth in HS. I think that it shall be a good way to help people who are going through what I am (went) through. Although it is my personal belief that you have to undergo the change yourself to fully understand anything.
Also next year I plan on going on a date. I think now I am ready.
**
My family is down for my grandparents 50th anniversary and nothing could be more hellish. Oh well, I go back to school in one week.
ciao,
C
Comments
You're against Universal heal
You're against Universal health care!?
no kidding...
The idea of health care not being universal is what scares me, because it means that health care will be a luxury for those who can afford it (not to say that it isn't already like that to some degree). The Libertarian Party is just too right-wing for my tastes.
hmmm
I don't really want my blog to turn into a political diatribe for or against one thing or another. But I do want to say a few things. Firstly when I say universal health care I mean the package that Dean proposes. I think that it is a terrible idea which empirical evidence suggests (a year and a half waiting time in England's NHS (national Heath service- a universal heath program) to get a knee operated on. That is a bit poor if you ask me. Americans are used to right here right now service, which elsewhere in the world does not exist. God forbid we have to wait an hour in the ER. Most of the world could only imagine it. I think that what Dean is proposing is nothing short of the death wish against heath care as we know it. Personally I want heath care to be the best, and to be the best I am willing to pay whatever price I have to pay. Now I hear the cries, but the poor the poor. Let me tell you that if you go into a hospital with a major crises that needs doctor attention- the doctors are not going to ignore you. Contrary to popular opinion and modern propaganda doctors' first question is not "how much money do you have" Such questions are reserved for the absurd antics of Monty Python and the like.
If you look, you will see that patients are not turned down b/c they have no money. Perhaps in cases of plastic surgery- but in the case of necessity they are not denied it.
Furthermore, this package proposed by Dean will do little to actually help patients get the best medicine. If drug companies and the like are unable to do R-D to make new drugs because they are undercut by generic medicines and the like, then who will do drug research. The only alternative is the government. And if they can't figure out the difference between metric and English measurements when it comes to landing a lander on Mars, god only knows the money that shall be wasted on unbeneficial drugs.
Lastly, anyone who claims that the libertarian party is too-right wing is quite ill-advised. While they may be economically conservative (low taxes et al) they are also socially liberal. They simple believe in freedom and the constitution as it was meant to be. They believe in equal rights for all men and women, gay black white, straight etc... The political opposite of libertarianism is authoritarianism. The latter believes in social conservatism (restrictions on social thought/ actions) and economic liberalism in the modern sense (restrictions on how much money you are allowed to make- taxes). How anyone can claim the libertarians to be too-far right needs to do some basic research, and not read propaganda published by any group.
However, I do not wish this to be a political post- therefore, should you wish to quibble with me I suggest you contact me or begin a new page.
I always hate to sully my blogs with such pointless threads as these- lol I never knew I would create controversy.
:-P
a dopo,
C
---
Allora, sono tornato!
hmmmm
I don't want to get into a cat fight either, but I just want to add a little tidbit here. While they're fairly left-wing politically and socially, the Libertarians strike me as being pretty far to the right when it comes to their economic beliefs, and a lot of their solutions to the problems with things like health care and education, when not naive and fundamentally flawed, seem to be geared more towards helping the rich than helping the common folk.
I fail to see how privatising public services will improve quality or accessibility. When a private individual gains control of a public service, he or she can then cut employees' benefits and wages and spend less money on replacing and updating equipment and infrastructure. This was actually one of the main reasons for the blackout on the East Coast: the public utility companies were sold to private interests, and the scenario described above is what happened. To reiterate, I fail to see how privatising health care would have better results.
I favor private enterprise, but I also think that there are certain services and industries such as health care, education, and communications (i.e. the phone system, highways, etc.), which should be kept out of the filthy hands of sociopathic fat cats.
Anyway, like you said, let's communicate privately should we wish to continue this debate :)